Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal
Main page Back issues Editorial board Information

December, 2012, Vol. 14, No. 4

CONTENTS

SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES

Evaluation of inorganic particles of composite resins with nanofiller content
Eduardo Gonçalves Mota, Lucas Hörlle, Hugo Mitsuo Oshima, Luciana Mayumi Hirakata
103-107

Adaptation and Validation of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale in Lithuania
Birutė Jankauskienė, Julija Narbutaitė, Ričardas Kubilius, Alvydas Gleiznys

108-113

Influence of the temperature on the cement disintegration in cement-retained implant restorations
Tomas Linkevicius, Egle Vindasiute, Algirdas Puisys, Laura Linkeviciene, Olga Svediene
114-117

Pain and discomfort perception among patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: Results from one month follow-up study
Aiste Kavaliauskiene, Dalia Smailiene, Ieva Buskienė, Daiva Keriene
118-125

Evaluation of Mechanical Properties on three Nanofilled Composites
Rogério Simões Rosa, Eduardo Blando, Eduardo Gonçalves Mota, Hugo Mitsuo Silva Oshima, Luciana Hirakata, Roberto Hübler, Carlos Eduardo Agostini Balbinot, Luis Antonio Gaieski Pires
126-130

© 2012 Stomatologija

Stomatologija 2012; 14 (4): 114-7 145 KB

Influence of the temperature on the cement disintegration in cement-retained implant restorations

Tomas Linkevicius, Egle Vindasiute, Algirdas Puisys, Laura Linkeviciene, Olga Svediene

Summary

The aim of this study was to estimate the average disintegration temperature of three dental cements used for the cementation of the implant-supported prostheses. One hundred and twenty metal frameworks were fabricated and cemented on the prosthetic abutments with different dental cements. After heat treatment in the dental furnace, the samples were set for the separation to test the integration of the cement. Results have shown that resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RGIC) exhibited the lowest disintegration temperature (p<0.05), but there was no difference between zinc phosphate cement (ZPC) and dual cure resin cement (RC) (p>0.05). Average separation temperatures: RGIC – 306±23°C, RC – 363±71°C, it could not be calculated for the ZPC due to the eight unseparated specimens. Within the limitations of the study, it could be concluded that RGIC cement disintegrates at the lowest temperature and ZPC is not prone to break down after exposure to temperature.

Key words: Cement-retained restoration, Temperature, Cement disintegration, Restoration retrievability.

Received: 16 05 2011

Accepted for publishing: 21 12 2012


1Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
2Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania Vilnius
3Vilnius Implantology Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Tomas Linkevicius1, 2, 3 – D.D.S., Dip Pros, PhD, assoc. prof.
Egle Vindasiute2, 3 – D.D.S.
Algirdas Puisys2, 3 – D.D.S.
Laura Linkeviciene1 – D.D.S., PhD, lecturer
Olga Svediene1 – D.D.S., postgraduate student

Address correspondence to Dr. Tomas Linkevicius, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Zalgirio 115/117, LT – 08217, Vilnius, Lithuania.
E-mail address: linktomo@gmail.com